Heather Covington replies to the Brian McKnight Question on 98.7Kiss FM


Last night I caught a few minutes of The Brian McKnight Show on 98.7KISSFM and he asked listeners to call in regarding their thoughts on why woman are attracted to rich men? He wanted to know if women were attracted to their success, money or lifestyle and so I thought I would answer this question for all of the ladies holding down a real 9-5 job because they love it and can basically support themselves.

First, women are not attracted to men with money only. Money is filthy and has a stinch, isn’t valuable until you spend it and when you do, you want more and are never satisfied. If a man isn’t born rich, he has to work for it and if that work inteferes with a woman spending quality time with her soulmate than no amount of money can equate to real love.

Secondly, a woman is attracted to a man’s ability to provide for himself and hold down a secure relationship because normally, when there are money problems there goes the relationship. So it’s not enough to just have money, but a consistent means of self-support that says that a women won’t have to work 1o jobs int he event a man can’t make hold down a job.  A welathy man helps a woman feel less stressed and able to enjoy one’s relationship.

 

Thirdly, men with money have toys and that includes fast cars, a state of the art home theater, plenty of clothes and a lot of cash to travel which makes for a great relationship. In other words, the wealth is one thing, but spending quality time with one’s wealthy soulmate is even better. So men shouldn’t look at women like gold diggers. If they can attract you, then they can attract any wealthy man and she’s going to go to the one who bring her the most joy.  Having wealth can  afford that expensive gettaway trip she wants to take with you to some exotic island. There is an inner goddess in everyone that just wants to be pampered like one. Is that a woman’s crime?

Now some men will settle for any man whose just filthy rich, but those are your gold diggers who don’t care about themselves and joy, but just the money and wealth. And so Broan McKnight’s question would best serve 9-5 working women because if geared toward gold diggers, than that’s your answer.  Worming women just want someone who can match her own wealth and so, she can feel like a woman and not like a babysitter of a man’s dreams.

If a man doesn’t have wealth than he betterbe good for something more than a roll in the haystack because there are mouths to be fed, bolls to be paid and real responsibilities no woman has time to second guess if a relationship is going to make it. These are different times we live in. Ideal relationships begin in college or highschool and last a lifetime with new found wealth because either the man or woman is there during that journey to success from the start. If not, you have to understand that a woman is going to go after what matches her success in life or not pursue at all.

Don’t take it personal and never feel like you are being rejected because you may not have your career where you want it to be.  Trust if your career was stable, that woman would pursue  you. Your wealth may be the only way to impress her because she’s got pride and not going to settle for less. Today’s woman also, doesn’t mind being alone. In fact, it is more peaceful and allows her more time to work. If I had to choose work over man’s riches and gifts, I would choose work because if I know I can depend on myself. On other words, even being rich ain’t enough for today’s woman. She might even go after a better lover than a rich lover whose passion can equate with her work.

Now that is something to think about fellows.  Sorry if you are confused and dont’t know what the hell to do to attract the woman of your dreams. Women can be complicated creatures, but in all seriousness, with a voice like Brian McKnight  today’s man wouldn’t have to be rich or a good lover, just sing for me., shut up when I’m working and go occupy your time when I don’t want to be bothered.  Now that’s some real Disilgold Talk for you.

Now visit http://www.disilgold.com , THE HOTTEST SITE JUST GOT HOTTER!

www.Disilgold.com-Founder of Disilgold SOUL Magazine responds to Barnes & Noble “MONKEY DISPLAY” Controversy Question- WARNING VIRAL EMAIL DETECTED AMONG BLACK COMMUNITY



WE ARE NOT GIVING PUBLICITY FOR DEGRADATION OF OUR PRESIDENT LIKE SOME OTHER MEDIA SITES PROMOTING THAT PICTURE CIRCULATING! ALL OF THE PEOPLE POSTING IT HAVE FALLEN INTO THE TRAP! BE SMARTER! DON’T SUPRESS PRODUCTIVITY BY PROMOTING NEGATIVITY!”

HEATHER COVINGTON OF WWW.LITERARYDIVA.COM ASK HEATHER QUESTION OF THE DAY

Q: What do you think about the racist front store display controversy?

It has been brought to my attention that a Cora Gables store in Florida created a presentation in honor of Barack Obama in the store front. It is evident that the display was not only well intended to celebrate Ameica’s 44th president of the United States, but in the middle of the store front presentation, an offensive bestselling book about monkeys on the onset of the CHIMPANZEE disaster that lead to a woman’s face being mauled by an animal medicated with depressants was displayed. The New York Post which covered the inauguration with both supportive and sometimes adverse commentary from contributors, made headline news upon releasing an artist photo featuring a dead chimp shot and killed by police officers who simply mentioned, “There goes our stimulus plan!” With all roasting of president in the past, journalist questioned if civil rights and racial quality organization still prevalent and alive and strong in America among many churches was creating a double standard that protects Barack Obama of the normal bashing presidents receive within the first tradtional 100 days in office. Wealth has been amassed by artists who blatantly infringed on an artists work with fair use laws that enabled re-production and interpretation of the president in art work selling millions in paraphernalia.Unfortunately, this blatant oversight by Barnes and Noble, one of the larger chain stores has caused an uproar among peopel of all color and cultures calling for a ban of the establishment that has opened doors for hundreds of thousands of books each month to gain wealth. he ban on Barnes and Noble would certainly uplift sales of ethnic and multi-cultural stores all for it, but there is only one problem. If a store is held accountable for a prank by perhaps, a disgruntled worker, than this opens the door for any business black or white owned or other to be framed, set up and business destroyed. On the other hand, a paper like New York Post which has a team of editors who must approve or diapprove of entries would fall along the lines of intentional racism and perhaps have to pay a fine toward the commonwealth of inner city charitable contributions because after all, without standard media, the world of information disappears one by one and become the domain of wreckless media. Thus, the big brother effect gains momentum as media enties of the wreckless kind not held to standards and the will or need to apologize feed more poison into those readers minds who think they are identifying with a like cultural establishment actually weilded by a higher conglomerate much worse. It’s called, INTERDEPENDENCE MEDIA TRANSFER. Folsk won’t buy a newspaper or enter a store, so we’ll go bankrupt. take over the internet, reassign our names and take over without the n—- knowing. A perfect example is the syndicated blog I host called the New York Post so I can see just what the media is peddaling with my own eyes as well as media. Guess what, it syndicates the controlling conglomerates bound by hatred and destruction of Black and White people at the expense of readers addicted to GIBBERISH. We’re all victims of the demoralization of events ensued from a day to basis from large media and business establishments and there are more on the way. Call it SHAMELESS PROMOTION. These guys get viral advertisign indeed formally and literally. Our own internally severs discovered 4 emails with the MONKEY DISPLAY controversy and 3 were viral and rejected! In other words, you open these GROUNDBREAKING chain letters instead of verifiable newsletters for credible establishments and you get just what you were looking for, TROUBLE! Will I ban all of Barnes and Noble stores. HELLS NO! Are you crazy, but I do wish to see a public apology from those involved. Let everyone gain media and publicity and apologize. It’s a good thing. The day media doesn’t apologize is the day America has a problem. Got to admit that the New York Post and stores like Barnes and Noble were instrumental toward Barack Obama’s success as well. He did publish three books that sold through their chain stores reaching mainstream readers and the only papers that put Barack Obama on the cover here in New York reaching millions was the Daily News and the New York Post. So okay, we call a truce just like countries with weapons of mass destruction and so, nobody moves and noone gets hurt. Let’s just maintain order and calm down and reserve our energy for more detrimental matters on the way. I have never beebn offended by monkeys, God’s creatures in the light of Black Americans. I rather be compared to a damn monkey than a silly panther who walks around with game face and preys on little things it can catch like a coward. Monkeys are very much like humans. You tick them off, present a facade other than who you are and they attack. If a store is racist, let them put a whole display of monkeys and books by and about Black Americans in the same store front. A front store display equals sales.  JUST IN: INSIDERS ARE INFORMING US THAT THE PICTURE MAY HAVE BEEN TAMPERED WITH! HMM! Okay, who did it?

 

Visit http://www.Disilgold.com for more top stories. EMAIL your ASK HEATHER question to Disilgold@aol.com.